Better Support For Young Children With Special Education Needs

The Government is making substantial new investment of $19.5 million over the next three years to provide more, and better support for pre-schoolers and infants with special education needs. The extra funding and support for young children with special education needs is a component of the new Special Education 2000 package. Other details of the package were released in November.

“More children will get more funding to pay for the assistance and support they need to get the best possible start to their learning.”The extra assistance for pre-school children will increase the average level of support per child by a third,” the Ministers said. The new funding increases the average amount of funding per child by 33 percent. It means that more than 12,000 children will be able to receive special education services.

The funding will provide for:

·      Specialist support for parents, whanau and early childhood educators.
·      Direct work with children to help them learn and support them at early childhood centres.

“Children will get better access to specialist and other support services whether they are at home or in an early childhood education setting “There will be increased one-on-one support for those children who need assistance so they can attend an early childhood education setting. This will help the child learn and take care of their personal needs.” The extra funding will help children with high and moderate needs. Currently funding pays for a range of services for children with disabilities, speech-language problems, behaviour and learning problems, or who are deaf or hearing or vision impaired.

The Ministers said that helping these children at the earliest time has substantial long term benefits. It vastly improves their education opportunities, and reduces their dependency on more extensive services later in life. “This is an area where we need more research.  We need to find out more about the best level and mix of services in this age group to make sure the youngsters get the most benefit.  This funding will provide the additional support and assistance while more work will be done on this
issue.” The Ministers said details of the new proposal would be sent to early childhood education and special education providers,  and other sector groups over coming weeks.

 

Being bilingual ‘protects brain’

Being fluent in two languages may help to keep the brain sharper for longer, a study suggests. Researchers from York University in Canada carried out tests on 104 people between the ages of 30 and 88. They found that those who were fluent in two languages rather than just one were sharper mentally. Writing in the journal of Psychology and Ageing, they said being bilingual may protect against mental decline in old age. Previous studies have shown that keeping the brain active can protect against senile dementia.

Education in general can bestow benefits on cognitive function in later life Professor Clive Ballard, Alzheimer’s Society Research has shown that people who play musical instruments, dance or read regularly may be less likely to develop the condition. Other activities like doing crosswords or playing board games may also help.

Language skills

This latest study appears to back up the theory that language skills also have a protective effect. Dr Ellen Bialystok and colleagues at York University assessed the cognitive skills of all those involved in the study using a variety of widely recognised tests. They tested their vocabulary skills, their non-verbal reasoning ability and their reaction time. Half of the volunteers came from Canada and spoke only English. The other half came from India and were fluent in both English and Tamil. The volunteers had similar backgrounds in the sense that they were all educated to degree level and were all middle class.

The researchers found that the people who were fluent in English and Tamil responded faster than those who were fluent in just English. This applied to all age groups. The researchers also found that the bilingual volunteers were much less likely to suffer from the mental decline associated with old age. “The bilinguals were more efficient at all ages tested and showed a slower rate of decline for some processes with aging,” they said. “It appears…that bilingualism helps to offset age-related losses.”

The UK’s Alzheimer’s Society welcomed the study. “These findings, that early development of second language may improve a specific aspect of cognitive function in later life, are very interesting,” said Professor Clive Ballard, its director of research. “It is a possibility that the acquisition of a second language in early childhood may influence the process of the development of neuronal circuits.

“However, the results of this particular study need to be interpreted cautiously as they were comparing groups of individual of different nationalities, educated in different systems. “It is also well recognised that education in general can bestow benefits on cognitive function in later life.”

 

Address by Deputy Prime Minister to Early Childhood Education Council Annual Conference

This is not the time to give you a post-mortem on the Taranaki-King Country by-election.  That’s already been done by the so called “experts” in the media. We have learned some lessons from the by-election, and we are now focused on the future, with a commitment to continuing to deliver on our promises to the people of New Zealand. Next Thursday will see the delivery of the second Budget of this historic Coalition Government. Obviously no details can be given except it will be a big and exciting Budget – a Budget For The Times, and one geared to take us into the 21st Century.

We will tackle head-on the significant issues facing our society.  Issues like moing from dependence on the State to independence.  The Budget recognises that no-one wants to be permanently dependent on the State. For that reason the Budget will commit more money where it will have the biggest effect – more for Health, more for Education, more for Police and more to support the Coalition Government’s employment strategy.

There is good news for the economy and the business community, which will prove many of our critics wrong once again.  Critics like the Employers Federation which has criticised the Government for lacking vision, leadership and direction. They have claimed we have inhibited business growth, knowing full well that the Government has been actively working on lowering taxes, reforming employment and welfare, reducing compliance costs, reforming ACC and reducing bureaucracy.

The figures in the Budget will show that we have maintained a stable ship in a sea of uncertainty.  We have weathered the Asian storm well and we will prove the forecasters wrong. In short, the Budget will reinforce our message that New Zealand First, and the Coalition Government, is delivering on its promises and that includes early childhood education, but back to that in a minute. First, here’s a few of the things we’ve delivered since we formed the Government back in December 1996.

q    Low inflation.
q    A lower exchange rate to help farmers and exporters.
q    $1.752 billion dollars extra for public health over three years.
q    Free doctor

?s visits and prescriptions for children under six years
old.
q    $1.25 billion dollars extra for education over three years.
q    $55 million extra for early childhood education.
q    Pay parity for primary teachers.
q    Abolition of the superannuation surtax.
q    Removal of income & asset testing for senior citizens.
q    250+ extra police and 250 more to come.
q    Minimum wage increased to $7.00 with second increase to come.
q    Community wage and employment reforms.

That is a great record of achievements that would NOT have happened without New Zealand First, and we are going to build on these things in the Budget. Now back to early childhood education.  This is an area which we are committed to developing because our young children are our greatest resource. We intend to give our children a running start in life, by nurturing their education and health in the early years, as these are critical to their long-term success. Research shows quality education in the early years impacts on a child’s success at school, at university, in the work force and in society. As the late American clergyman Hosea Ballou (1771-1852) once said, “Education commences at the mother’s knee, and every word spoken within the hearing of little children tends towards the formation of character.”

It’s important that we lay down the right foundation for our children to build on.  It’s no good building a house on sand. That is why we have committed $872 million to early childhood education over three years, $55 million more than in the previous three years.  And that’s why we have introduced free doctors visits for children under six. Healthy bodies have, in turn, a healthy regard to the rigours of learning.

We know the formative years of a child’s life are vital to their future success. Take a walk through Paremoremo Prison and you will see what happens to children whose health and education needs are neglected.  You’ll find most prisoners share the common problems of hearing deficiency and illiteracy.

As a boy growing up in a country village in the far North I remember seeing other children at school with yellow gunk weeping from their ears because of untreated infections.  That is the kind of problem we are addressing now through our policies on health and early childhood education giving our children a running start in life. Some of the money we got for education will be used to buy more resources for special education for under sixes, and some will be used to develop new education centres and the teaching skills needed to run them properly, which is the type of work that most of you here are involved in.

Earlier this week New Zealand First MP and Associate Education Minister Brian Donnelly launched the Early Childhood Development Strategic Plan, which has the slogan “Right From The Start.” One of the main goals of that plan is to ensure a high level of quality in early childhood education and parenting. This will be achieved through various programmes such as “The Strengthening Families Strategy” which aims to break inter-generational cycles of poverty within families.

By co-ordinating better access to Health, Welfare and Education services, we can alleviate some pressure on families and help them to create a positive environment for their children. Strong families will result in less unemployment, less crime and a more cohesive society. The Awhina Matua parent education programme is another initiative aimed at promoting stronger families and parent involvement in educating children. Under this programme, a project worker works with families who have no access to early childhood education services by setting up parent groups and introducing them to mutual support networks  such as the local iwi, marae groups, the Maori Women?s Welfare League, early childhood services, community health workers and schools.

Awhina Matua is carried out in communities and brings together parents of similar backgrounds and needs.  When the group being helped becomes self-sustaining the project worker withdraws. The Code of Social Responsibility is another Government initiative aimed at strengthening our families. The Code is about addressing the cycle of poverty and abuse that affects many New Zealand families. We can no longer turn away from child abuse and crimes against children, in some spineless hand wringing disavowal of the facts. That’s why we have devised a Code that challenges us to face up to these realities and to promote the values that this country was founded on. Values like fairness and freedom to pursue a better life for ourselves and our children.

That’s what the code is about families with limited incomes aspiring for the same things for their children that all parents do regardless of race and socio-economic status. That is not only the basics like clothing on their backs, food on the table and a roof over their heads, but also a good education, future prosperity and personal happiness. We all want those things for our children and we freely acknowledge that for some families those things come easier than others.  Greater personal and financial sacrifice are demanded by some families to make these dreams a reality for their children.

Another initiative we have begun is the Family Start Service.  This initiative is one of the single most important initiatives undertaken so far by the Coalition Government. Under this programme Health, Education and Welfare agencies work together, sharing expertise and networks for the benefit of individual families. The Early Childhood Development Unit is also involved in the programme to ensure a focus on the well being of the child. Government has also turned its attention to increasing the participation rates of under represented groups such as Maori and Pacific Islanders in early childhood education.

Last year, the Early Childhood Development Unit established 16 playgroups for Maori in the Waikato and further playgroups were established for Arabic, Ethiopian and Korean ethic groups. Many of you here today will be interested in the Government’s commitment to continuous improvement and quality staff in early childhood education. We are reviewing the licensing points system for early childhood services. Currently the system is very complex and difficult to work. We are getting rid of some of the anomalies to make requirements for qualifications fairer.  Once the points system has been sorted out, we can move on to looking at ways to make those regimes better as well. Then there is PAFT, Parents as First Teachers, which is co-ordinated by the Early Childhood Education Unit.

PAFT is based on the belief that parents are their children?s first and most important teachers.  The programme helps parents to participate more effectively in their children?s educational development. These are just some of the many initiatives the Government is pursuing to nurture our children and these initiatives reflect the need to balance the objectives of access and quality in early childhood education. While we have provided the money and the platform for future development for early childhood education, we rely heavily on the commitment of professionals like you. It’s important that you as owners, managers and teachers in childhood education centres, do not underestimate the importance of your work in shaping the hearts and minds of future generations. In the words of William A. Ward: “The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher
inspires.”

 

High Costs and Low Results Incurred by Early Education Programs

Expanding the number of children required to attend school increases state education costs and thereby may mean an increase in taxes. Such an instant expansion of the student population requires the hiring of more teachers, more truant officers, and more administrative staff. While the change in some school districts may be negligible, the change to the combined school districts of a state would produce a significant impact on state revenues.

When a lowering of compulsory attendance age was considered in Alabama in 1991, the Alabama Legislative Fiscal Offices estimated the cost of the change to be at least $4.7 million per year.10 In 1998, when Connecticut considered lowering its compulsory attendance age, a state department of education representative testified that one town (Enfield, CT) would require 13 new classrooms while another (Meridian, CT) would need 20 additional classrooms.11

Also consider Head Start, a federal program that began providing services in 1965 with an enrollment of 561,000 children and a budget of just over $96 million. By 2000, the enrollment had only grown to 860,000 children, but the budget had increased dramatically, costing taxpayers over $5 billion dollars. That is a 5,108% growth rate in spending with only a 53% increase in enrollment.

The most important goal of any education program is that children be educated. Studies of Head Start, however, demonstrate that early education produces no apparent academic benefits. In its early years, extensive studies were undertaken to prove Head Start worked. But the opposite turned out to be true. In 1969, the Westinghouse Learning Corporation found no difference in the behavior and educational achievement between Head Start and other underclass children.

Sixteen years later, the CRS Synthesis Project study, commissioned by HHS, came to the same conclusion. Although children showed “immediate gains,” by the second grade “there are no educationally meaningful differences.”12

 

Group to Label Video Games That Teach

*Associated Press/AP Online        

        DALLAS – Does “The Sims” video game accurately depict human psychology? Does a train simulator like “Railroad Tycoon” broach some basic engineering ideas? A group of educators, developers and game publishers believe they might. The consortium, calling itself The Education Arcade, is launching a “games for learning” seal of approval to help consumers identify titles that teach more than hand-eye coordination.
        The labels are to be announced Monday to kick off the   Electronic Entertainment Expo in Los Angeles and should begin appearing this fall. Members of the consortium include MIT’s Comparative Media   Studies program, the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Education and LeapFrog Enterprises Inc., an educational toy maker.”What we hope is something that looks like the Good   Housekeeping seal of approval,” said Alex Chisholm, LeapFrog’s director of content. Beyond labels, the group hopes to persuade game companies to   make more educational games. It could be a tough sell, though, in an industry that favors low-risk, high-profit sequels built on established franchises.
        “Learning multiplication tables on an Xbox hasn’t  exactly happened,” American Technology Research analyst P.J. McNealy said. “People would rather shoot people, punch somebody or throw a football than learn math.”
        Top titles often take millions of dollars and years to produce, and putting that amount of effort into an educational game is simply too risky, said Warren Spector, studio director of game company Ion Storm in Austin. “In the same way that documentaries don’t really compete with fiction films, I don’t ever expect to see educational games succeed at the financial level expected of a commercial entertainment game,” Spector said. He said educational games will be harder to find and won’t be as well produced.
        So-called “edutainment” titles, which blend fun with learning, account for a sliver of the $10 billion North American video game business. U.S. educational PC software sales have plunged to $191 million last year, from $340 million in 2001, according to The NPD Group, a market research firm.
        LeapFrog, long seen as a success story with its line of   handheld educational game devices, has stumbled lately, posting first quarter losses of $11.8 million on sales of $72 million. Many edutainment products simply have been squeezed out of   store shelves to make room for better-selling shooters and sports titles, said Deborah Forte, president of Scholastic Entertainment in New York. In fact, many companies have gone to great lengths to make educational programs more like recess and less like a final exam. THQ Inc. of Calabasas Hills, Calif., spent several years and   millions of dollars converting a realistic Army training program called “Full Spectrum Warrior” into a commercial video game.
        When it debuts this summer, players will still learn the   intricacies of urban warfare, but only as a side effect of winning, THQ chief executive Brian Farrell said. “We’re in the business of entertaining our   consumers,” he said. “That’s a very separate market, I think. They’re two different kinds of experiences and they’ll stay that way for the foreseeable future.” Such sentiment isn’t stopping MIT and Colonial Williamsburg from collaborating on an online role-playing game, “Revolution,” in which players experience the American Revolution in a three-dimensional virtual world. They hope to license it to a game company this summer.
        “Games can be both entertaining and educational,”   said Henry Jenkins, head of MIT’s Comparative Media Studies program and co-director of The Education Arcade. “The challenge is to get companies to realize there is some good in the ‘L’ word” – for learning. For now, The Education Arcade is tweaking the labeling   guidelines. Issues include whether labels should have detailed information about age-appropriateness or simply specify topics the game addresses, like math or reading.
        There’s a risk that overlabeling could confuse consumers.   Already, game boxes are littered with sales information,   hardware requirements and ratings information from the nonprofit Entertainment Software Ratings Board. Similar to those for movies, the software ratings consider   violence, language and other factors. Ratings range from “EC” for early childhood to “AO” for risque, adult-only content. The ratings board has advised The Education Arcade and supports “more information for parents in any format,” said its president, Patricia Vance.
       Andrew Bub, a stay-at-home father of two who created the video game Web site gamerdad.com, said labels would be nice but only go so far. Rather, he said, parents need to stay involved with their children’s gaming habits. “My belief is you should play games with kids rather than just hysterically assume they’re going to be bad for them,” he said.
        Not all parents believe video games need to be educational.Monica Martin, a mother of two in Frisco, Texas, said the  time her 6-year-old son, Alex, spends playing “Pokemon Coliseum” is all about having fun. “He goes to school for seven hours. He just wants to go   home and play,” Martin said. “I clean houses for a living, and let me tell you, the last thing I want to do when I get home is clean some more.”

Data Tapes Available for the NHES:91 Early Childhood Education and Adult Education Data Files

The U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) announces the availability of data tapes and users manuals for the 1991 National Household Education Survey (NHES), the Early Childhood Education (ECE) component and the Adult Education (AE) component.  NHES:91 was a random-digit-dial telephone survey developed by NCES.  The sample for the NHES is drawn from the noninstitutionalized civilian population in households with a telephone in the 50 states and the District of Columbia.  The survey was conducted between late January and early May of 1991.

NHES:91 collected data on 3- to 8-year-old children’s experiences in a wide range of settings, including their homes, childcare arrangements, early education programs, and schools. A survey of participation in adult education among person 16 years of age and older was conducted simultaneously.  Data were collected on the level and characteristics of adult education participation. The files for these two general components of NHES:91 are described below.

Preprimary and Primary Files.  Data from the Early Childhood Education component are divided into two separate data files–the Preprimary File and the Primary File.  The Preprimary File contains responses from completed interviews with the parents of 7,655 children who have not yet enrolled in kindergarten.  The Primary File contains responses from completed interviews with the parents of 6,237 children enrolled in grades 1 and above. Users will be able to merge the Preprimary File with the Primary
File for the purposes of conducting analyses involving all 13,892 children.

Adult and Course Files.  During NHES:91, a sample of adults were questioned about their educational activities over the previous 12-month period.  Data from the Adult Education component are divided into two separate files–the Adult File and the Course File. The Adult File contains responses from each completed AE interview.  There is one record for each completed AE interview; thus, there are 12,568 records in this file.  The Course File contains a record for each part-time course reported by participants in the AE interview (up to four course were allowed).  The file is intended for analyses in which the course, rather than the individual, is the unit of analysis (aggregated course information is also included in the Adult File as part of the record of each adult).  The Adult and Course Files can be merged using a common identifier.

Ordering Information.  The NHES:91 files are available as magnetic tapes.  The ECE Component Files and the AE Component Files are sold separately.  In addition to the raw data files, each tape has SAS system files and SPSSX  and SAS control cards for converting the raw data to SPSSX and SAS formats.  These tapes can be purchased for $175 each, or $250 for both.

 

“But, Studies Show…!”

Since the Communism thread has morphed into a home-schooling debate, I thought I’d share some thoughts on that here. The current thread has become almost impossible to follow. There are many reasons why home schooling is becoming such a popular option for parents in the United States, among them the overall failure of the public school systems, a recognition among fly-over folk that children need parents more than they need institutions, and the growing realization that home-schooled kids are outperforming their counterparts. I could relate my own experiences, and will if anyone asks, but that would be anecdotal and so not relevant.

The discussion underway focuses on very young children, so the thing that I wish to refute is this vague, airy dismissal of the concerns voiced over compulsary attendance for small children and the natural rights of human beings as affirmed by the Consitution in the United States. If one is going to use the “studies show” gambit in defense of one’s pre-conceived notions, then one had damned well better be prepared to cite those studies. In this case, “studies show” exactly the opposite of the position held.

Below is the entire text of the HSLDA’s position on the issue of early education, complete with citations. Mandatory Kindergarten Is Unnecessary Compelling children to attend school at an earlier age does not yield consistent results.

Compulsory attendance or mandatory kindergarten at early ages is not the way to improve academic excellence. In fact, it may harm the development of young children to force them into the school system at a young age. The studies below demonstrate that compelling 5 and 6 year olds to attend school is not only unnecessary, but also violates a parent’s fundamental right to direct the education of their children, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S.
510 (1925); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 at 233; Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000).

 

Building knowledge for better early childhood learning

Additional funding of nearly $2 million will see three new early childhood education Centres of Innovation next year, Education Minister Trevor Mallard announced today. “These new centres, in addition to the six begun last year, will strengthen quality in early childhood teaching and share knowledge of what works best for New Zealand children,” Trevor Mallard said.

“This government is committed to lifting participation in early childhood education and to improving children’s learning and development in these critical years which set the foundation for future learning.” “By being better informed about quality teaching practices we can provide our children with the best possible learning opportunities.”

Trevor Mallard said the Centres of Innovation are supported for three years through assistance and funding to research and develop innovative approaches to teaching and learning. Centres of Innovation support continuous improvement in early childhood education, encourage provider collaboration, facilitate networks of learning support, build research capability, share information, develop leadership and strengthen quality teaching and learning.

“Centres of Innovation are a significant way of improving quality in early childhood education, one of the key goals in Pathways to the Future: Huarahi Arataki, the early childhood education strategic plan, launched in 2002. “The ECE Centres of Innovation programme has shown how vibrant and innovative the early childhood education sector is and reflects its commitment to developing the best teaching practice to support effective learning for children.

The first six centres focused on innovations in the use of ICT, improved links between services, and quality practices in M=E4ori and Pasifika bilingual and immersion services. The Ministry of Education is currently analysing the focus for the next three centres and the selection process would get underway later in the year.

 

The Cuban Education System

The Cuban education system: lessons and dilemmas  
Document Type: LAC Human & Social Development Group Paper Series

The Cuban educational system has long enjoyed a reputation for high quality. This paper highlights ways in which the Cuban educational system, despite the dismal economic picture of the past decade, adopted features that research has identified as characterizing a high-quality education system. The papers sees what has allowed Cuba ‘ s education system to perform so well is the continuity its education strategies, sustained high levels of investments in education, and a comprehensive and carefully structured system, characterized by: 1) quality basic education and universal access to primary and secondary school; 2) comprehensive early childhood education and student health programs; 3) complementary educational programs for those outside school; 4) mechanisms to foster community participation in school management; 5) great attention to teachers; 6) low-cost instructional materials of high quality; 7) teacher and student initiative in adapting the national curriculum locally; 8) carefully structured competition; 9) explicit strategies to reach rural students; 10) strategies to link school and work; and 11) an emphasis on education for social cohesion and values education.

 

Past Experiences

Another aspect is also how the individual responds to whatever environment they find themself. I would conjecture that what results in later development problems for one child doesn’t necessarily imply another child will have the same or any difficulties. Of course one can list extreme conditions, and perhaps no one would argue about such extreme conditions.

KW replies: most of the resilience studies done here in Hawaii have shown that as long as the child has had at least one positive/loving person in their life ( coach, scout leader, clergy, next  door neighbor etc) the ability to express a strength to seemingly overcome trauma or impoverished early life, not free of symptoms, but able to be a “good person” is greatly inhanced.KW John Price wrote: I also wonder about the preception of ‘abuse’ as seen by ‘modern’ standards. What we would call ‘abuse’ these days, was often either taken as proper conduction of parents, or even if not done, was seen as parental failure. I’m mystified as to how the entire human race could survive long enough to come to the conclusion that its entire parenting history has been one of abuse. So, I’ll claim that most, essentially all, a predominant portion of the population has the resilience require to ‘survive’ a broad range of ‘abuse’ however that’s defined. KW replies: I agree with you here John; there is a lot to say about social judgements on behavior of others as shapeing the knife of what is moral and correct in our society. I also think that it is the interactions between us that will write the narratives of future moralities, beliefs, expectations etc. It has been shown in many of the postmodern therapies that how we experience ourselves and think about ourselves is a social construction. As one of my teachers used to say; ” get 10 people to investigate for you. Tell 5 of them to investigate how dangerous the world is and tell 5 to investigate how safe the world is. Five will return with information of how dangerous the world is, and five will return with information of how safe the world is; it is up to you to choose because both groups are correct; so what are you going to choose; safe or dangerous; the choice is up to you of how you want to live your life; as the world being dangerous or safe?”KWNorm mentioned that he thinks trauma affects people even if they are not damaged by it.  I cannot see how this is different than other, non-traumatic experiences.  Everything that happens to us affects us in some way.

While the story below makes an important point, I find the metaphor problematic.  Someone who experiences difficulties and overcomes them is usually strengthened by that experience and gains a larger repertoire of techniques for coping with adversity.  A vase that is broken and mended will be less strong and more likely to break again along the fault lines.  If someone were holding themselves together superficially but fragile underneath, I can see them “breaking” under stress.  If someone did undergo long term therapy and managed to reorganize their personality, I think they would be stronger and better able to withstand pressures of life.

When I was working with parents of gifted children, I researched coping skills and stress because it was so frequently implicated in situations of suicide and substance abuse.  The research I’ve seen about stress says that children who are subjected to repeated stresses without support or to multiple concurrent stresses are more likely to have difficulty coping than children who have less stress.  However, children who encounter stress with support or manageable stress (not overwhelming to their resources) are able
to develop increasingly more effective coping skills and wind up more resilient.  The suggestion is that parents should not routinely protect their children from all stress but should permit them to experience negative emotions (with support) and handle difficulties themselves as much as possible while being careful to ensure they do not become overwhelmed.  I have seen some research that suggests that kids most prone to substance abuse are those who believe themselves unable to cope with normal stresses, who are intolerant of strong emotion in themselves, and who have poor coping skills.